加尔各答驱逐舰舰 印度为什么说加尔各答级完胜052D(5)

[–]iVarun 11 points 19 days ago

Stuff like NIMBY specifically.

But the quote is incorrect already.

We already make comprises on Liberty. Liberty exists on a

spectrum, there is no such thing as Absolute Liberty. India lacks

many liberties which even a place like China had, things like what

you can wear, freedom and opportunities for jobs, social-economic

upliftment, etc. These are also Liberties.

Chinese have a different make up of Liberties from that

spectrum. They lack Political liberties. Though thier make up is

changing from what it used to be even 20 years ago.

No one has Absolute Liberty and never will as long as we are

the same species. It's an illogical premise.

Liberty did nothing for the 500 MILLION Indians (200 Million

of whom were children) who died in abject poverty from 1950-2005

across multiple generations.

Poverty alleviation has higher hierarchy than the

need/compulsion to have a slightly wider swath of some sections of

Liberty spectrum at a particular stage of development.

There is NOTHING worse than Poverty. NOTHING.

像专门反对一样，虽然那话也不正确。我们现在已经放弃自由了。自由只是一小范围的自由，没有绝对的自由。印度甚至和中国一样缺乏许多自由。比如你能穿什么、工作的自由和机会、社会经济的提升等等，这些也是自由。

中国某种程度上也有不同的自由。他们缺乏政治自由，虽然和20年相比已经有了改变。

没人会有绝对自由，只要我们是同一物种就绝不会有绝对自由。这是符合逻辑的前提。

自由对于在1950~2005年中死于赤贫的5亿人（包括2亿儿童）来说没什么卵用。

发展到一定阶段后，相对需要或被迫拥有更宽泛的自由而言，消除贫困是更高层次。没什么比赤贫更糟糕了。

[–]tyronequan 2 points 16 days ago

Like Abdul Kalam said "India's biggest enemy is poverty"

就像阿卜杜勒·卡拉姆所说的：;印度最大的敌人是贫穷。

[–]whoawhoawhoayou 7 points 19 days ago

We will progress very slowly. It might take another 100 years